Hi, dear,
as you can see in the attached pic.
when 60k users online, it costs around 10 milliseconds to set a buddy variable.
can you review your buddy's source code regarding this issue?
thanks!
set buddy variable gets slower as more users online
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 27 Mar 2014, 03:34
set buddy variable gets slower as more users online
- Attachments
-
- QQ图片20160701211716.jpg
- 10k users online
- (34.33 KiB) Not downloaded yet
-
- QQ图片20160701211708.jpg
- 20~30k users online
- (45.73 KiB) Not downloaded yet
-
- QQ图片20160701211700.jpg
- 60k users online
- (24.6 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Re: set buddy variable gets slower as more users online
This is expected.
With a very high load every buddy variables update requires the server to look up the clients that need to be updated. The code is already very optimized and the fact that it runs in ~10ms shows confirm it.
I mean with 10ms you still have a throughput of 100 request/sec per thread. That's pretty good for a server loaded with 60K CCU, IMO
(Try do that on an HTTP server, with the same hardware settings... )
cheers
With a very high load every buddy variables update requires the server to look up the clients that need to be updated. The code is already very optimized and the fact that it runs in ~10ms shows confirm it.
I mean with 10ms you still have a throughput of 100 request/sec per thread. That's pretty good for a server loaded with 60K CCU, IMO
(Try do that on an HTTP server, with the same hardware settings... )
cheers
Re: set buddy variable gets slower as more users online
I am sorry this is the first time in 11 years of history of this website that I have to remove a post that is not spam.
We do not tolerate decompilation, as clearly stated in the license agreement that accompanies every copy of SmarFoxServer.
We are willing to provide all possible help for free and indefinitely provided we all stick to the same rules. If you think you can come here to post reverse engineered code and start pointing out what you think is or isn't the cause of your perceived problem then I am afraid we won't be able to help you.
If you don't feel like you can respect the basic terms our software License then please stop posting here. There is nothing we can do for you.
We do not tolerate decompilation, as clearly stated in the license agreement that accompanies every copy of SmarFoxServer.
We are willing to provide all possible help for free and indefinitely provided we all stick to the same rules. If you think you can come here to post reverse engineered code and start pointing out what you think is or isn't the cause of your perceived problem then I am afraid we won't be able to help you.
If you don't feel like you can respect the basic terms our software License then please stop posting here. There is nothing we can do for you.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests